Evans

Evans v. Presidio Trust

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20204:19-cv-08025California2,531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT EVANS, Case No. 19-cv-08025-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO

v. FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

PRESIDIO TRUST, Re: Dkt. Nos. 30, 43 Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court are Defendant Presidio Trust’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint and Plaintiff Robert Evans’ motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. Dkt. Nos. 30, 43. The Court held a telephonic hearing on November 12, 2020. See Dkt. No. 48. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss and DENIES the motion for leave to file an amended complaint. I. BACKGROUND On December 9, 2019, Plaintiff, representing himself, filed a complaint against Defendant for trade secret misappropriation in violation of the Defense of Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1836, and the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“CUTSA”), California Civil Code 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.