V.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Y. P. V., Case No. 20-cv-03874-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND

REMANDING FOR FURTHER

PIERANCH, et al., ACTION Defendants. Docket No.

12 13 On May 12, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. Defendant removed this action on June 12, 2020, asserting federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because the case arises, in part, under 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (“Title VI”). Notice of Removal (Docket No. 1). Defendant now moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Motion to Dismiss FAC (Docket No. 47). For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Title VI claim and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. This matter is remanded to…