Julian

Julian v. TTE Technology, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20203:20-cv-02857California7,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER JULIAN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02857-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

TTE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Docket No. 27 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiffs Christopher Julian, Mark Pacan, Paul Fiskratti, and Wayne Lewald (hereinafter, “Plaintiffs”) have filed a class action against TTE Technology, Inc. dba TCL North America (hereafter, “Defendant”), asserting that Defendant has engaged in false advertising with respect to its televisions. Currently pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”). Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion. I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In their complaint, Plaintiffs allege as follows. Defendant sells televisions throughout the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.