SPRAWLDEF
SPRAWLDEF v. City of Richmond
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SPRAWLDEF, ET AL., CASE NO. 18-cv-03918-YGR
Petitioners, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
AMEND; GRANTING MOTION FOR
vs. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
CITY OF RICHMOND, ET AL., Dkt. Nos. 130, 134 Respondents.
Presently before the Court are the motion of petitioners Paul Carman, Citizens for East Shore Parks, James Hanson, SPRAWLDEF, Pamela Stello, and Tony Sustak to amend their First Amended Petition, as well as the motion of respondents Mayor Tom Butt, City of Richmond, and Richmond City Council (collectively, “the City”) for judgment on the pleadings as to the operative First Amended Petition. Having carefully considered the papers submitted, the matters properly subject to judicial notice,1 and the pleadings and record in this action, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion to amend and GRANTS the motion for judgment on the pleadings.2
25 1 The City’s requests for…