SPRAWLDEF

SPRAWLDEF v. City of Richmond

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20204:18-cv-03918California1,717 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SPRAWLDEF, ET AL., CASE NO. 18-cv-03918-YGR

Petitioners, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

AMEND; GRANTING MOTION FOR

vs. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

CITY OF RICHMOND, ET AL., Dkt. Nos. 130, 134 Respondents.

Presently before the Court are the motion of petitioners Paul Carman, Citizens for East Shore Parks, James Hanson, SPRAWLDEF, Pamela Stello, and Tony Sustak to amend their First Amended Petition, as well as the motion of respondents Mayor Tom Butt, City of Richmond, and Richmond City Council (collectively, “the City”) for judgment on the pleadings as to the operative First Amended Petition. Having carefully considered the papers submitted, the matters properly subject to judicial notice,1 and the pleadings and record in this action, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion to amend and GRANTS the motion for judgment on the pleadings.2

25 1 The City’s requests for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.