Holden

Holden v. Fluent, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20203:20-cv-03816California8,857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 COQUESE HOLDEN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-03816-JCS Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 12(B)(6) FLUENT, INC., et al., OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT Defendants. UNDER RULE 12(E) 11 Re: Dkt. No. 17

13 I. INTRODUCTION This action was removed from San Mateo County Superior Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. See Notice of Removal (dkt. 1). In the First Amended Complaint, dkt. no. 15 (“FAC”), Plaintiffs Coquese Holden and ten other individuals name as defendants Fluent, Inc. and Fluent, LLC (collectively, “Fluent”), as well as fifty individuals identified only as Does 1–50. Plaintiffs assert three state law claims against Fluent based on “at least 1,300 emails” (“the emails”) they allegedly received from Fluent. Presently before the Court is Fluent’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.