Sayce
Sayce v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER L. SAYCE, et al., Case No. 20-cv-00076-SI
Plaintiffs,
ORDER APPOINTING CO-LEAD
v. PLAINTIFFS GLAZER FUNDS AND
MEITAV; APPROVING SELECTION
FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et OF CO-LEAD COUNSEL al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 63, 64, 76, 81 Defendants. 12 13 Now before the Court in this securities action are three competing motions to appoint lead plaintiff and for approval of their selection of lead counsel. Dkt. Nos. 63, 64, 81. This matter came on for videoconference hearing on November 6, 2020. For the following reasons and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the motions for appointment of lead plaintiff by the Glazer Funds and Meitav. See Dkt. Nos. 63, 81. The Court APPOINTS the Glazer Funds and Meitav as co-lead plaintiffs in this case and APPROVES their selection of co-lead counsel, Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky, LLP and Pomerantz LLP. 21 BACKGROUND I. Factual Background…