Roscioli

Roscioli v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20205:19-cv-03894California6,578 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ROBERT E. ROSCIOLI, Case No. 19-cv-03894-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 24 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Robert Roscioli appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 1381, et seq. The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) determined at step two of the sequential analysis that Mr. Roscioli does not have a severe impairment or combination of impairments that significantly limits his ability to perform basic work-related activities for 12 consecutive months. Mr. Roscioli contends that the ALJ erred in finding that his mental impairments are not severe. Additionally, Mr. Roscioli claims that the ALJ improperly rejected…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.