Lema

Lema v. The People

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20203:20-cv-00631California238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LEMA, Case No. 20-cv-00631-VC (PR)

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS;

v. DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

THE PEOPLE,

Respondent.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. Even if Lema’s claim were not procedurally defaulted, and even if the trial court’s erroneous response to the jury’s question gave rise to a federal due process claim, the error almost certainly did not have a substantial and injurious effect on the verdict, because there was virtually no evidence to support Lema’s assertion that he merely committed manslaughter as opposed to murder. See Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 637 (1993). This is so for the reasons explained by the California Court of Appeal in its harmless error analysis. A certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). This is not a case in which “reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Clerk shall enter

1In accordance with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.