Connor, M.D. v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20204:19-cv-06552California2,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CAROLINE L. CONNOR, M.D., Case No. 4:19-cv-06552-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT v.

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF Re: Dkt. Nos. 44,

AMERICA,

10 Defendant.

11 Plaintiff Caroline L. Connor, M.D., brings this action against defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America (“Unum”) under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §1001, et seq. (“ERISA”), challenging the denial of benefits under a long- term disability (“LTD”) plan. In short, this matter turns on two issues. First, the interpretation of on one sentence in the underlying LTD plan regarding eligibility; and second, whether Dr. Connor worked at least 30 hours a week to qualify for benefits under the LTD plan. For the reasons set forth more fully below, the Court finds that Dr. Connor qualifies an eligible employee for disability benefits. Accordingly, Dr. Conner’s motion for judgment is GRANTED. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND1 Dr. Connor was formerly a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.