Quantum Labs, Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Products Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20205:18-cv-07598California2,437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 QUANTUM LABS, INC., et al., Case No. 18-cv-07598-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO

v. AMEND COMPLAINT

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS INC, [Re: ECF 86] et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Quantum Labs, Inc. (“Quantum”) moves for leave to file a third amended complaint—which would be its fifth pleading— to join as plaintiff HTE Labs, Inc. (“HTE Labs”), a subsidiary of Hyperion Group, Inc., and to assert claims for negligence and negligence per se, trespass, and breach of contact. ECF 86. Because Quantum has failed to show good cause, the Court DENIES its motion for leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND

19 On December 19, 2018, Quantum filed a complaint with eleven causes of action including 20 negligence and negligence per se, trespass, and breach of contract. ECF 1. On April 17, 2109, the 21 Court issued a scheduling order setting June 17, 2019 as the last day to amend the pleadings or add 22 parties. ECF 34. The next week,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.