Chinitz
Chinitz v. Intero Real Estate Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 RONALD CHINITZ, Case No. 18-cv-05623-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER APPROVING IN PART
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE PLAN
INTERO REAL ESTATE SERVICES, [Re: ECF 131] Defendant.
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Ronald Chinitz’s motion for approval of class notice plan. See Mot., ECF 131. Defendant Intero Real Estate Services (“Intero”) opposes many elements of this plan, see Opp’n, ECF 142, and Chinitz proposed several compromises, see Reply, ECF 144. Generally speaking, the Court finds the notice plan the best notice practicable under the circumstances, with the combination of direct and indirect notice plans appearing reasonably calculated to reach at least 70% of class members. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will approve in part Chinitz’s proposed notice plan. I. BACKGROUND On July 22, 2020, this Court granted Chinitz’s motion for class…