Biden

La Clinica De La Raza v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20204:19-cv-04980California14,463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04980-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN

PART, DENYING IN PART, AND

DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., DEFERRING RULING IN PART ON

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 166

13 Before the court is defendants Donald J. Trump, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (“USCIS”), Chad Wolf,1 and Kenneth Cuccinelli’s (collectively “defendants”) motion to dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND This case involves a challenge to the implementation of the final rule entitled “Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds,” published by DHS on August 14, 2019. See Inadmissibility on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.