Jeloudov

Jeloudov v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20203:20-cv-02492California306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY JODI JELOUDOV, Case No. 20-cv-02492-VC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

WELLS FARGO BANK N.A, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 65 Defendants.

Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss Jeloudov’s amended complaint is granted. To the extent the amended complaint alleges claims relating to Jeloudov’s employment with Wells Fargo, those claims are barred by principles of res judicata based on the judicially noticeable materials relating to Gregory Jeloudov v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al., Case No. CGC-15-546027, showing that Jeloudov brought nearly identical claims against Wells Fargo in San Francisco Superior Court in 2015, and those claims were dismissed with prejudice. See Hako-Med USA, Inc. v. Axion Worldwide, Inc., 2010 WL 4448824, at *2-4 (D. Haw. Oct. 29, 2010). To the extent the amended complaint alleges claims based on a global conspiracy among Wells Fargo employees, President Donald Trump, Senator Mitch McConnell, and President Vladimir Putin to harass and discriminate against Jeloudov, those claims are dismissed under Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.