Lopez

Lopez v. Robinson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20205:20-cv-07619California257 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW R. LOPEZ, Case No. 20-07619 SVK (PR)

Petitioner,

ORDER OF TRANSFER

v.

JAMES ROBERTSON, et al., Respondent.

Petitioner, a state prisoner at Pelican Bay State Prison, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his state conviction from the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). However, petitions challenging a conviction or sentence are preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Here, because petitioner challenges a conviction from Stanislaus County, the Eastern District of California is the district of conviction. /// /// /// Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.