Klein

Klein v. Ellison

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20203:20-cv-04439California1,140 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 R. ANDRE KLEIN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04439-JSC Plaintiffs, Case No. 20-cv-05255-JSC 8 v. ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION LAWRENCE J. ELLISON, et al., TO CONSOLIDATE Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 46

ALISON SHERMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 v.

LAWRENCE J. ELLISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to consolidate the Klein and Sherman actions. (Dkt. No. 46.) Having considered the parties’ briefs, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS Defendants’ motion to consolidate. BACKGROUND On July 2, 2020, Mr. Klein filed a derivative action against certain directors and officers of defendants Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”), bringing claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, unjust enrichment, and violation of section 14(a) of the Security…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.