Castillo

Castillo v. San Jose Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20205:19-cv-02410California177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 HECTOR CASTILLO, et al., Case No.19-cv-02410-NC

Plaintiffs, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL v. DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 43 SAN JOSE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. 16 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the || case, provided that such motion is filed within 60 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 60 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 || Dated: December 2, 2020 h@e—— —> …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.