Briggs
Briggs v. Addenton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
, 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6 7 RONNIE BRIGGS, No. C 20-7165 WHA (PR) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL; GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED v. IN FORMA PAUPERIS
BRIAN ADDENTON; ARRON
KIAEJAMAL, (ECF Nos 7, 8) Defendants. / 13 Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which individuals seeking to proceed in forma pauperis seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity and identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990). To state a claim under 42…