Hightower
Hightower v. Celestron Acquisition, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
13 IN RE TELESCOPES ANTITRUST Case No. 5:20-cv-03639-EJD 14 LITIGATION Case No. 5:20-cv-03642-EJD
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ORDER GRANTING DIRECT AND
INDIRECT PURCHASER
17 All Actions PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING ALTERNATIVE
SERVICE
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is Direct and Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Order Authorizing Alternative Service. Dkt. No. 99 (“Motion”). Having considered all the papers and pleadings on file, the Court had determined that the matter is suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Defendants Celestron Acquisition, LLC, SW Technology Corp, Corey Lee, David Anderson, and Joseph Lupica oppose the Motion on the grounds that Plaintiffs have made no effort to effectuate service through the Hague Convention or letters rogatory and have therefore failed to show that…