Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund v. Floor Covering Contracts

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20203:20-cv-03577California3,743 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING Case No. 20-cv-03577-EMC PENSION FUND, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. Docket No.

FLOOR COVERING CONTRACTS,

11 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiffs are the Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund and its Board of Trustees. They have filed suit against Defendant Floor Covering Contracts (“FCC”), a sole proprietorship, seeking to collect delinquent withdrawal liability. Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment. FCC did not file an opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion, nor did it make an appearance at the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion. Having considered the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for relief. I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND As noted above, the instant case concerns withdrawal liability. See 29 U.S.C. § 1381(a) (“If an employer withdraws from a multiemployer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.