Prescott

Prescott v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20205:20-cv-02101California4,263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 STEVEN PRESCOTT, Case No. 20-cv-02101-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, COMPLAINT, WITHOUT LEAVE TO

AMEND

Defendant. [Re: ECF 26]

15 Plaintiff Steven Prescott (“Prescott”) brings this putative class action against Defendant Reckitt Benckiser LLC (“RB”) on behalf of California residents who purchased “Woolite Laundry Detergent,” which is defined to include both Woolite Darks laundry detergent and Woolite Gentle Cycle laundry detergent. See FAC ¶ 14, ECF 24. Prescott claims that RB fraudulently represents in its advertising and labeling that Woolite Laundry Detergent “brings the color back” to clothing, “revives color,” and possesses “Color Renew,” when in fact the detergent does not revive color in clothing. FAC ¶¶ 1-5. RB has filed a motion to dismiss the first amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.