Wilson

Wilson v. Wilson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20203:20-cv-01076California872 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL GEARY WILSON, Case No. 20-cv-01076-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING

v. DISQUALIFICATION REQUEST

JAMI CAROLINE WILSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendants.

Pro se plaintiff Michael Wilson has filed a request for judicial disqualification. Dkt. No. 16. The request is denied. Wilson filed a complaint against his ex-wife and her lawyers, among others, for an alleged conspiracy involving custody of a daughter. Dkt. No. 1. In the course of reviewing Wilson’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court approved IFP status and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend for failure to allege a plausible claim. Dkt. No. 6. Wilson timely filed a first amended complaint. Dkt. No. 7. After that, Wilson filed a letter and declaration requesting disqualification of the undersigned as one of the “31 judges on this Court’s bench” who “have failed to notice” that N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 7-3 is “incompatible” with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.