George

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JOSEPH ANTHONY GEORGE, Case No. 20-cv-03244-SI Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION RALPH DIAZ, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants. On August 24, 2020, this action was dismissed and plaintiff's second requests for a || temporary restraining order and appointment of counsel were denied. Plaintiff now moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) for reconsideration of that order. Reconsideration under Rule || 60(b) “is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) |} committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening || change in controlling law.” School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). Plaintiff first argues that the court erred by failing to rule on his second request Z, || for…