Boswell
Boswell v. Babcock
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH BOSWELL, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06571-JSW
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND
v. DENYING, IN PART, MOTION TO
DISMISS AND SETTING INITIAL
MICHAEL BABCOCK, et al., CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 11
12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss filed by Michael Babcock (“Babcock”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court VACATES the hearing scheduled for December 11, 2020, and it HEREBY GRANTS, IN PART, AND DENIES, IN PART, Babcock’s motion, with leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, Joseph Boswell (“Boswell”) and Greg Sarlo (“Sarlo”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), bring claims against Babcock and two corporate defendants, Pure Natures Design, Inc. (“PND”) and Xtreme…