Joseph

Joseph v. Koh

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20203:20-cv-03782California4,629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RHAWN JOSEPH, Case No. 20-cv-03782-WHO

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. AND GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

LUCY KOH, et al., WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 32,

12 Pro se plaintiff Rhawn Joseph sues for alleged civil rights and other violations arising from municipal code enforcement. Before me are two motions. The City defendants’ move to dismiss the Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. Joseph moves for partial summary judgment on his “Demand for Declarative and Injunctive Relief’ and “Monell Liability, Constitutional Torts” claims. He also asks that I reinstate his Fifth Amendment due process claim, which was previously dismissed with prejudice, and order summary judgment on that claim as well. I find these motions are suitable for decision without oral argument and VACATE the hearing scheduled for December 9,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.