McGrath v. Doordash, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20203:19-cv-05279California1,592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JACOB MCGRATH, Case No. 19-cv-05279-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS, AND

DOORDASH, INC., DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

Defendant. Docket Nos. 200, 206 12 13 The above-referenced case is a FLSA collective action. More than 3,000 individuals have opted into the case (although no conditional certification has been issued as of yet which would result in formal notice to potential collective members). Previously, the Court granted DoorDash’s motion to compel arbitration. Specifically, the Court ordered to arbitration all individuals who had opted into the lawsuit except for a handful of persons who had validly opted out of the arbitration agreement. See Docket No. 199 (order). Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of that order. The gist of Plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider is that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.