In re Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20205:20-cv-03556California1,847 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 Case No. 20-cv-03556-BLF

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY DISCOVERY

IN RE GOOGLE DIGITAL

ADVERTISING ANTITRUST

LITIGATION

13 This is a class action antitrust lawsuit brought by Plaintiffs Hanson Law Firm, PC, Surefreight Global LLC d/b/a Prana Pets, and Vitor Lindo (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Defendant Google LLC (“Google”). Before the Court is Google’s Motion to Stay Discovery. Mot., ECF 41. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacates the April 8, 2021 hearing as to this motion. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Google’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs commenced this putative class action on May 27, 2020. ECF 1. The First Amended Complaint alleges that “Google leveraged its monopoly in online search and search advertising to acquire an illegal monopoly in brokering display advertising—the placement of …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.