Kaufman

Kaufman v. Marsh And McLennan Companies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20205:20-cv-01213California2,850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

LAKEYSHA KAUFMAN,

Case No. 5:20-cv-01213-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. REMAND; DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

MARSH AND MCLENNAN

COMPANIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 26 Defendants.

Plaintiff Lakeysha Kaufman (“Plaintiff”) filed the present motion for an order remanding this case to the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Santa Clara, arguing that there is no subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiff alleges no actual injury and, therefore, lacks Article III standing. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, Dkt. No. 20 (“Plaintiff’s Mot.”). Defendants Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and Marsh USA Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) then filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, concurring that Plaintiff lacks Article III standing but arguing that dismissal, rather…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.