Jericho Nicolas v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20204:19-cv-08228California6,979 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERICHO NICHOLAS, et al., Case No. 19-cv-08228-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., COMPLAINT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 39

Before the court is defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.’s (“defendant”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 39) plaintiffs’ second amended complaint. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND This suit is a putative wage and hour class action premised on the alleged violation of various California and federal labor laws. Defendant develops and maintains a technology platform that connects riders with ride-share drivers through a mobile- device application (the “Uber App”). Dkt. 37 (Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”)) ¶ 15. Plaintiffs Mark Glinoga (“Glinoga”), Alexis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.