Bankwitz

Bankwitz v. Ecolab, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20203:17-cv-02924California1,983 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT BANKWITZ, et al., Case No. 17-cv-02924-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL

v. BRIEFING AND/OR EVIDENCE

ECOLAB, INC., A DELAWARE Docket No. 132

CORPORATION,

11 Defendant. 12 13 The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval. Based on that review, the Court orders the parties to provide supplemental briefing and/or evidence. A joint filing is strongly preferred. If the parties disagree on any issue, they may simply provide their respective positions. The supplemental briefing and/or evidence shall be filed by December 17, 2020. A. Confidential Global Settlement Agreement It appears that the instant settlement is part of a global settlement agreement. See Sett. Agmt. at 1 (referring to the Confidential Global Settlement Agreement). The parties shall provide a general explanation of what the global settlement agreement is. If the parties wish to file this explanation or any part thereof under seal,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.