Gomez

Gomez v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20203:19-cv-06129California273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELROY PEDRO GOMEZ, Case No. 19-cv-06129-SI Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

v. APPEALABILITY WILLIAM “JOE” SULLIVAN, Respondent.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied and judgment entered on October 16, 2020, 14 || and petitioner’s earlier-filed request for appointment of counsel was denied on October 20, 2020. || Petitioner thereafter filed a notice of appeal from the October 20, 2020 order, and identified specific a 16 || alleged errors in that order. This matter was referred by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth || Circuit to the undersigned for the limited purpose of determining whether to issue a certificate of S 18 || appealability as to the October 20, 2020 order. A certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 |} U.S.C. § 2253(c). This is not a case in which “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the 20 || petition states a valid claim of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.