Voong

Bradford v. Voong

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20204:17-cv-04964California4,261 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SYLVESTER BRADFORD, Case No. 17-cv-04964-HSG

Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER DISMISSING

FEDERAL LAW CLAIMS WITH

v. PREJUDICE; GRANTING LEAVE TO

FILE MOTION FOR

MINH VOONG, et al., RECONSIDERATION; REMANDING

ACTION TO STATE COURT1

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 34

13 Plaintiff has filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) where he was previously housed. On May 2, 2018, the Court screened the complaint and found that Plaintiff had stated two cognizable Eighth Amendment claims and two cognizable federal due process claims. Dkt. No. 26. In the screening order, the Court ordered the parties to show cause why the Court should or should not find that Plaintiff’s false accusation allegation states a cognizable federal due process claim. The parties have responded to the Court’s order to show cause. Dkt. Nos. 29 and 32. Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.