Fingix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 IHEALTH LABS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-05699-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE MOTION FOR

ALTERNATIVE SERVICE

FINGIX, I-ENTERPRISE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff iHealth Labs, Inc. (“iHealth”) filed this trademark infringement and counterfeit goods action on August 14, 2020 against defendants Fingix, i-Enterprise, Hong Ta LLC, Lovesilverhalos, Adina Elegance, LED Eagle, Charli Discount, L222L a/k/a Blustercool, Samantha Belloc, LILIMI, R Delivery, and Does 1-100. Dkt. No. 1. iHealth now moves for an order permitting it to serve certain defendants through alternative electronic means under Rule 4(f)(3) and (h)(2). Dkt. No. 15. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered iHealth’s moving papers, the Court denies the motion without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND iHealth alleges that it…