Redd-Oyedele

Redd-Oyedele v. Santa Clara County Office of Education

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20205:20-cv-00912California3,700 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANN GERTHELIA REDD-OYEDELE, Case No. 20-cv-00912-SVK

Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION OF

DEFENDANT MARY ANN DEWAN TO

v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 24 11 Defendants. 12 Now before the Court is Defendant Mary Ann Dewan’s motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. 24. All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. 5, 11. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court deems this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. For the reasons that follow, Defendant Dewan’s motion to dismiss the FAC is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The factual background of this case is more fully set forth in the Court’s order on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the original complaint. Dkt. 22. Plaintiff Ann Redd-Oyedele has been employed by Defendant Santa Clara County Office of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.