Burgos

Burgos v. Sunvalleytek International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20204:18-cv-06910California4,459 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 INES BURGOS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06910-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION

v. SETTLEMENT

SUNVALLEYTEK INTERNATIONAL, Re: Dkt. No.

INC.,

11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court are Ines Burgos and Mongkol Mahavongtrakul’s (“Plaintiffs”) motion for final approval of class action settlement, for attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses, and a class representative enhancement payment. Dkt. No. 48 (“Mot.”). Defendant Sunvalleytek International, Inc. (“Sunvalleytek” or “Defendant”) opposes the motion for attorneys’ fees. Dkt. No. 49 (“Opp.”). The Court held a hearing on the motion on August 20, 2020. See Dkt. No. 51. At the hearing, the Court directed the parties to file a supplemental memorandum regarding the class definition and proposed class notice. Id. On September 24, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a supplemental memorandum, requesting that the Court approve the settlement as amended; order …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.