Ross
National Urban League v. Ross
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11 NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE, et al., Case No. 20-CV-05799-LHK 12 Plaintiffs,
AMENDED ORDER DENYING
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v.
AND CLARIFYING ORDER TO
COMPEL WILBUR L. ROSS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 376 Defendants.
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for leave to file an emergency motion for reconsideration of the Court’s December 10, 2020 Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel, ECF No. 372 (“Order to Compel”), or, in the alternative, for a protective order. ECF No. 376 (“Mot.” or “Motion”). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion for reconsideration and CLARIFIES the Order to Compel.1 Like the Order to Compel, this Order is necessarily brief because time is of the essence. The holidays are approaching, and the fact discovery cut-off is January 7, 2021. ECF No. 357. Moreover,…