Ross

National Urban League v. Ross

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20205:20-cv-05799California3,618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11 NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE, et al., Case No. 20-CV-05799-LHK 12 Plaintiffs,

AMENDED ORDER DENYING

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v.

AND CLARIFYING ORDER TO

COMPEL WILBUR L. ROSS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 376 Defendants.

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for leave to file an emergency motion for reconsideration of the Court’s December 10, 2020 Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel, ECF No. 372 (“Order to Compel”), or, in the alternative, for a protective order. ECF No. 376 (“Mot.” or “Motion”). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion for reconsideration and CLARIFIES the Order to Compel.1 Like the Order to Compel, this Order is necessarily brief because time is of the essence. The holidays are approaching, and the fact discovery cut-off is January 7, 2021. ECF No. 357. Moreover,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.