Postpichal

Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20203:19-cv-07270California7,806 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERMAINE THOMAS, JEREMAIN

MILLER, JAMIE POSTPICHAL,

RONALD ELLISON, SARAH WATERS, No. C 19-07270 WHA

KAMILAH RIDDICK, FELICIA

REDDICK, TIARA CROMWELL, LYSHA

ENCARNACION, LANIE HALE,

MELIZZA WEAVER, ALFREDO ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND SANCHEZ, and CLARISSA KELLY, on DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S behalf of themselves and other similarly MOTION TO COMPEL situated, ARBITRATON

Plaintiffs, 16 v.

CRICKET WIRELESS, LLC,

18 Defendant.

INTRODUCTION In this putative class action arising out of defendant’s alleged false advertising of its wireless services, defendant moves to compel arbitration of three of the named plaintiffs. One of the plaintiff has since voluntarily dismissed herself from this action. Accordingly, this order considers defendant’s motion only as to the other two plaintiffs, Jermaine Thomas and Sarah Waters. This order finds that Thomas must arbitrate his claims against Cricket, but not Waters. To the extent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.