Hutson

Hutson v. AMCO Insurance Co Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20203:19-cv-03667California929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANICE HUTSON, et al., Case No. 19-cv-03667-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

AMCO INSURANCE CO INC, et al., Docket No. 69 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiffs are the heirs of a woman named Betty Hutson. They initially sued two companies: AMCO Insurance Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, NA. In August 2020, Plaintiffs and Wells settled their dispute, and thus Wells was dismissed from the suit. See Docket Nos. 58, 60 (notice of settlement and order dismissing action against Wells). Thus, at this juncture, the only defendant in the case is AMCO and the only cause of action against AMCO (following the Court’s order on a 12(b)(6) motion) is one for unjust enrichment. Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a third amended complaint (“TAC”). In the motion, Plaintiffs ask that new plaintiffs be added to this action so that the new plaintiffs can…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.