Postpichal

Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20203:19-cv-07270California1,565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JERMAINE THOMAS, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07270-WHA (AGT)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS

CRICKET WIRELESS, LLC, RESPONSIVE TO RFP NO. 57 Defendant. Re: ECF No. 119

Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint discovery letter in which plaintiffs seek an order compelling defendant Cricket Wireless LLC to produce its litigation hold notices and related correspondence. ECF No. 119. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’ motion to compel is denied without prejudice to renewal, if warranted, after completion of the upcoming deposition of Cricket’s Rule 30(b)(6) representative on document retention. A. Background In this putative class action, plaintiffs allege that between 2012 and 2014, Cricket sold 4G/LTE devices and service plans to customers nationwide by falsely advertising its 4G/LTE coverage. Plaintiffs contend that Cricket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.