In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20205:19-cv-04286California1,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 Case No. 19-cv-04286-BLF

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

IN RE GOOGLE ASSISTANT PRIVACY APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM CO-

LITIGATION LEAD COUNSEL; VACATING

JANUARY 14, 2021 MOTION

HEARING

Before the Court is a Motion for Appointment of Interim Co-Lead Counsel by Asif 14 Kumandan, Melissa Spurr, Melissa Spurr, as guardian of B.S., a minor, Lourdes Galvan, and 15 Eleeanna Galvan (“the moving Plaintiffs”). Mot., ECF 113. Moving Plaintiffs seek to appoint 16 Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. and Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP as co-lead interim counsels. Id. 17 at 1. Plaintiffs Edward Brekhus and Jon Hernandez (“the Brekhus Plaintiffs”) oppose this motion 18 and, in the alternative, request that their preferred counsel, Gutride Safier LLP, be appointed interim class counsel. Opp., ECF 114. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES 21 WITHOUT PREJUDICE the motion to appoint interim co-class counsel. 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.