Dunbar

Dunbar v. Arnold

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20203:20-cv-07235California1,663 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDDIE L. DUNBAR, No. C 20-7235 WHA (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE AND

PARTIAL DISMISSAL

v. CAPTAIN J. ARNOLD; C. FULLER;

M. SOTELO; G. ANGUIANO;

LIEUTENANT M. FRANGOS;

LIEUTENANT TEXEIRA;

LIEUTENANT S. WILLINGHAM;

WARDEN DON BLOOMFIELD; T.

JOHNSON; O. SERRENTINO; L.

PETERS; J. VALDEZ; J. MOUA; E.

SANDERS; J. BEM; R. CELIS; S.

ARANA; S. LUCAS; C.

CALDERON; NONAY;

LIEUTENANT J. BISHOP;

SERGEANT BERRY; Defendants. / 18 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a California prisoner who filed this pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials for violating his constitutional rights. For the reasons discussed below, certain claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief, and the complaint is ordered served upon certain defendants based upon plaintiff’s cognizable claims. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted in a separate order. ANALYSIS A. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.