Dunbar
Dunbar v. Arnold
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20203:20-cv-07235California1,663 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDDIE L. DUNBAR, No. C 20-7235 WHA (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE AND
PARTIAL DISMISSAL
v. CAPTAIN J. ARNOLD; C. FULLER;
M. SOTELO; G. ANGUIANO;
LIEUTENANT M. FRANGOS;
LIEUTENANT TEXEIRA;
LIEUTENANT S. WILLINGHAM;
WARDEN DON BLOOMFIELD; T.
JOHNSON; O. SERRENTINO; L.
PETERS; J. VALDEZ; J. MOUA; E.
SANDERS; J. BEM; R. CELIS; S.
ARANA; S. LUCAS; C.
CALDERON; NONAY;
LIEUTENANT J. BISHOP;
SERGEANT BERRY; Defendants. / 18 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a California prisoner who filed this pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials for violating his constitutional rights. For the reasons discussed below, certain claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief, and the complaint is ordered served upon certain defendants based upon plaintiff’s cognizable claims. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted in a separate order. ANALYSIS A. …