Petrick

Petrick v. Stars Bay Area, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20205:19-cv-03105California259 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KRISTEN PETRICK, et al., Case No. 19-cv-03105-VKD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AS MOOT

STARS BAY AREA, INC, Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendant.

13 Before the Court is defendant Stars Bay Area, Inc.’s (“Stars Bay Area”) motion to dismiss plaintiff Kristen Petrick’s complaint pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 17. On December 11, 2020, in lieu of filing an opposition to Stars Bay Area’s motion and before Stars Bay Area filed a responsive pleading to the original complaint, Ms. Petrick filed an amended complaint. Dkt. No. 27. A plaintiff may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days of service of a motion under Rule 12(b). Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). An amended pleading generally supersedes an original pleading. Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner and Co., Inc., 896 F.3d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.