Solis

Solis v. City of Sunnyvale

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20205:20-cv-03912California5,923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CHAD SOLIS, Case No. 20-cv-03912-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST CITY OF SUNNYVALE, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 30 15 16 Defendants Ngo and the City of Sunnyvale move to dismiss plaintiff Chad Solis’ first amended complaint. See Dkt. No. 30, Motion to Dismiss (“MTD”). As before, Solis alleges that Defendants detained him, applied excessive force, and forcefully took his apartment keys to search his apartment without consent. See Dkt. No. 29, First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Again, however, Solis fails to allege facts to support his claims against Ngo and the City. The Court finds that Solis’ amended complaint still fails to allege a sufficient nexus between Ngo’s own conduct and the alleged constitutional violations of his subordinates. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.