Barno

Barno v. Padilla

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20203:20-cv-03886California1,152 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RODNEY BERNARD BARNO, Case No. 20-cv-03886-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR A

v. TRO

ARMANDO PADILLA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendants.

12 Rodney Barno, a California prisoner incarcerated at the Correctional Training Facility in Soledad, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court determined in an order of service filed November 6, 2020, that the complaint stated cognizable § 1983 claims against six defendants for retaliation and for violating Barno’s First Amendment right to send mail based on events that occurred in 2018 and early 2019. Efforts to serve process on those six members of the correctional staff at CTF-Soledad are underway. Barno now requests a temporary restraining order (TRO), contending that he is being subjected to harassment and retaliation by correctional officers Tuiolosega and Orzepeda and an inmate – none of whom are defendants in this action – due to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.