Soto

Soto v. Child Protective Services Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20203:20-cv-06520California2,232 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 ELESHA SOTO, Case No. 20-cv-6520-JCS

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DEPARTMENT, et al., DISMISSED 9 Defendants.

10 I. INTRODUCTION The Court previously ordered Plaintiff Elesha Soto, pro se,1 to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. Dkt. 4. Soto has now filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 8. Good cause having been shown, that application is GRANTED. The Court now reviews Soto’s complaint to determine whether the case should go forward under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons discussed below, Soto is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the complaint should not be dismissed, by filing no later than January 22, 2021 either an amended complaint or a response arguing why her current complaint is sufficient. If Soto does not file a response by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.