Apple Inc v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20203:20-cv-02460California10,462 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11 APPLE INC., Case No. 20-CV-02460-LHK 12 Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING CONSOLIDATED
MOTION TO DISMISS v. Re: Dkt. No.
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
15 Defendant.
AT&T CORP., et al., Case No. 20-CV-02995-LHK
Plaintiffs,
v.
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Defendant. 22 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, Case No. 20-CV-03092-LHK Plaintiff, 24 v.
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
26 Defendant. 27 Plaintiffs Apple, Inc. (“Apple”); AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc., and AT&T Mobility (collectively, “AT&T”); and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) each sue Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“Defendant”) for a declaration of non- infringement and invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 10,218,606 (“the ’606 patent”). In addition, Apple sues Defendant for a declaration of non-infringement and invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 9,935,872 (“the ’872 patent”).…