Williams v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20204:19-cv-00576California870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

MARK F. HAZELWOOD, State Bar No. 136521 mhazelwood@aghwlaw.com KIMBERLY Y. CHIN, State Bar No. 271333 kchin@aghwlaw.com ERICA C. GONZALEZ, State Bar No. 289557 egonzalez@aghwlaw.com ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 697-2000 Facsimile: (415) 813-2045 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF RICHMOND and RHA HOUSING CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 MONIQUE WILLIAMS, Case No. 4:19-cv-00576-YGR Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER DETERMINING

GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT

v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION dba AMTRAK; UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation; CITY OF RICHMOND, a California Government Entity; COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a California Government Entity; and DOES 1-50, Defendants. 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff, MONIQUE WILLIAMS, and defendants, CITY OF RICHMOND and RHA HOUSING CORPORATION, as follows: 1. Defendants the CITY OF RICHMOND and RHA HOUSING CORPORATION have collectively…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.