Twitter, Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20203:20-cv-02397California8,893 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TWITTER, INC., Case No. 20-CV-02397-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 31 VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Twitter, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) sues Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“Defendant”) for a declaration of non-infringement and invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 10,218,606 (“the ’606 patent”). Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND This case represents the latest chapter in a long dispute between the parties regarding whether Plaintiff infringes Defendant’s patents, which relate to a system for routing internet- protocol communications. Below, the Court discusses in turn: (1) the parties; (2) Defendant’s first set of lawsuits against Plaintiff, Apple, AT&T, and Verizon, originally filed in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.