Panah

Panah v. State of California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20205:14-cv-00166California3,073 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOOMAN PANAH, an individual, Case No. 14-00166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE

ORDER AND APPOINTMENT OF v. COUNSEL; DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

DISPOSITIVE MOTION AND TO

CORRECTIONS AND COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S REHABILITATION, et al., DEPOSITION 17 Defendants. (Docket Nos. 218, 219, 222) 19 Plaintiff, an inmate on death row at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) proceeding pro se, filed a second amended complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging unconstitutional acts by SQSP correctional officers. Dkt. Nos. 54, 67. On September 29, 2020, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss claims as untimely and ordered briefing on the only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.