Bright

(PC) Hill v. Bright

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20204:20-cv-02581California2,535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYMEYON HILL,

Case No. 20-cv-02581-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE v. 6 DR. DARREN BRIGHT, et al., 7 Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a civil detainee currently in custody at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted in a separate order. Plaintiff has named as Defendants in this action the following SVSP physicians: Dr. Darren Bright (Chief Physician) and Dr. Silva. Dkt. 1 at 2. Venue is proper because the events giving rise to the claims are alleged to have occurred at SVSP, which is located in this judicial district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Plaintiff seeks monetary and punitive damages. II. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.