Shuman

Shuman v. SquareTrade Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20203:20-cv-02725California4,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SHUMAN,

Case No. 20-cv-02725-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

SQUARETRADE INC., DISMISS

10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 30

12 I. INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, Plaintiff Michael Shuman alleges that Defendant SquareTrade, Inc. (“SquareTrade”), which sells service contracts for the protection of consumer goods, consistently fails to provide consumers with the full terms and conditions of the contract at the time of purchase and systematically pays reimbursement in an amount that is less than the purchase price of the covered item when claims are filed. In his complaint, he asserts claims under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301, et seq. (Claims One and Two), the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1790 (Claim Four), and California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.